> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 18:21:59 -0600 > From: Paul Johnson <[email protected]> > To: Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> > Cc: "Eric H. Christensen" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Alaska Highway AK-2 tagging > Message-ID: > <campm96qlbzrszabjszjfhxnn82nog2kapgwdfevqjpcxdw+...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:18 PM Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I would use highway=trunk the whole way for consistency. In Canada the > > connecting highway is also highway=trunk. This makes sense because AK 2 is > > linking Fairbanks, the largest city in this part of Alaska, with All the > > cities in Canada and the lower 48 States. > > > > That's kind of my thinking as to why it should be primary instead of > secondary (as typical for the US for state highways). Almost all of it's > not even paved, it'd be a hard stretch to call it an expressway (trunk).
All of AK 2 between Fairbanks and the Canadian border is paved. I can vouch for this personally. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
