I do have Washington State tribal lands available [1] as a background layer for JOSM. There is also a vector tile layer [2] of the same background available for iD users.
The data contains the name in english and the land type of Disputed Area, Off-Reservation Trust Land, Reservation, and Tribal Headquarters. Only 4 disputed areas but 60 Off-Reservation areas. Some people include Off-Reservation in tribal lands while others do not. My sense is that they should be tagged as boundary=aboriginal_lands. I'd like to hear the opinion of the group. [1] https://api.mapbox.com/styles/v1/glassman/cjtdkbw7p07vk1fnub70hf9uf/tiles/256/{z}/{x}/{y}@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1IjoiZ2xhc3NtYW4iLCJhIjoiRjk3dWdwYyJ9.Tg_fMJWxygeKBgVTrZHmGA [2] https://a.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/glassman.8ksk1dp4/{z}/{x}/{y}.mvt?access_token=pk.eyJ1IjoiZ2xhc3NtYW4iLCJhIjoiRjk3dWdwYyJ9.Tg_fMJWxygeKBgVTrZHmGA Best, Clifford On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 4:10 PM Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:03 PM Mike Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I've avoided BIA because their data doesn't seem accurate >> We have gotten some additional feedback off list also suggesting that the >> BIA data may not be as accurate as some other sources. Perhaps we should >> create a wiki page listing every reservation, its boundary status in OSM, >> and the known sources of data. Mappers can then "sign up" to work on >> individual reservation boundaries (by adding their name to the wiki page), >> manually comparing the various sources, researching the most correct >> representation, and of course editing OSM to reflect their findings.... >> just thinking out loud here.-- >> > > I'm feeling this a lot more than the MapRoulette idea. Especially if we > can get local participants involved. > -- @osm_washington www.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
