On Jul 7, 2020, at 4:37 PM, Bob Gambrel <[email protected]> wrote: > A very good answer stevea. I suspect the changes I have been making would be > appropriate enough for removing tiger_reviewed=no. > > 1) almost always have driven the road as passenger taking notes in OSMAND+ > about pavement type > 2) in ID carefully aligning the roads > 3) in ID verifying that an extra road doesn't exist by looking at several > aerial phots sources before deleting > 4) setting pavement tpe > 5) setting lane counts > 6) putting in traffic signals where known > 7) noting stop signs where possible and adding stop sign nodes > > Have been less likely to change road type. For example have left minor rural > roads as residential if there are farms on it. I have made sure that service > roads and driveways are not naked as residential. > > From now on I will get rid of the tag as I walk through an area. > > Thanks for the two links and advice. Am not ready to exhaustively do an area > by using OT. For now just concentration on roads that I have been on and > taken notes about and have created and uploaded traces for.
That all sounds great. As I have said, "no mapping task that positively contributes to OSM is too small." We all make contributions at our own pace, biting off what we are able to chew. "The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." (Slaying the TIGER dragon involves individuals one at a time whacking away the tiger:reviewed=no tag). It's all good, SteveA _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
