Thanks for diving in.   If it's a very minor unimproved road and not clearly service, I usually tag it track.   I would suggest adding some indication of road quality.   If it's an improved gravel road, I consider surface=gravel sufficient.   If it's rougher than an improved gravel road, surface=unpaved (in my area the surface is usually a mix of dirt, rocks, gravel, so unpaved seems best),   and smoothness=very_bad (high clearance), or horrible (4wd) [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness], or 4wd_only=yes .

The USFS motor vehicle use maps (MVUM) are very useful.

I think most of the road signs say FS, and most of the tags in my area use FS, but the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#National_Forest_Road_System) says to use FR .   I don't know the history, or if it really matters.  If someone is reading a map & it says FR or FS, they probably won't even notice.

Keep this in mind when getting frustrated with the tiger data, I think we would have next to nothing if it didn't get imported.

Brad

On 7/19/20 5:50 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Mike, welcome to the real world. Tiger street data is better than nothing but not much. It's positionally inaccurate and many roads are wrongly classified. a rough guide at best. I do use the Tiger Roads 2019 overlay to add names to streets and roads though. The names are reasonably accurate in my experience.

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 5:57 AM Mike Thompson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 4:49 PM <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

         For
        roads that appear to be public access (e.g. to go to a lake)
        but are
        obviously even more minor than tertiary roads I label
        highway=unclassified.

    highway=unclassified are for roads that connect small towns, or
    for "local traffic", while access to a lake could be considered
    "local traffic", I would think it would be better if these would
    be highway=service, or highway=track.


        The US Topo map gives forest road references so I add ref FS xxxx.

    That is what I have been doing as well. Some are recommending that
    they be made into route relations, which I am starting to do.


        TIGER seems to be at best very coarse, at worst fictional.

    +1

    Mike
    _______________________________________________
    Talk-us mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us



--
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to