> On Jul 20, 2020, at 4:48 PM, Tod Fitch <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Jul 20, 2020, at 4:35 PM, Clifford Snow <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:46 AM <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Clifford, >> >> Could you repost the legend? It's hard/impossible to make out the >> surface reliably from aerial photos. >> >> Sure - here is a link >> https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/7zQNGbyNQqBMj2S >> <https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/7zQNGbyNQqBMj2S> > > Looks a bit different than the legend on my April 2020, Coconino National > Forest Travel Map: > > https://cloud.fitchfamily.org/index.php/s/eKCYzc4TfjMMfdN > <https://cloud.fitchfamily.org/index.php/s/eKCYzc4TfjMMfdN> > > —Tod
Oops. Deleted it off my cloud after sending email. Here is it again: https://cloud.fitchfamily.org/index.php/s/9nrCyifxX2swSH8 Just looked at a map for the Los Padres and for the Sabino Canyon Recreational area in the Santa Catalina Mountains of the Coronado NF. Those legends are different yet. Is there a national standard that these forests are ignoring? Is it on a FS region basis? Is it on a forest basis? Does it vary based on when a map was published? I don’t see a consistent pattern with the FS maps I have at hand. —Tod
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
