This is an excellent idea. I didn't even notice this. THe bandwidth and
storage perks of doing this across large areas could be tremendous.
I hope this can be done, I would not have even suggested this in fear of it
going nowhere.

Think I am going to start looking for similiar problems in my vicinity.

Regards
Marlon

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:05 AM, David Schneider <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi List!
>
> I searched an address in the eastern parts of Cape Town, and I was
> suprised that nomatim didn't report it as residential. I checked the
> data, and found that vast parts of Cape Town's residential areas are
> made up from unclassified roads instead of residential!
> From the metadata, this seems to be the result of an import some
> years ago.
>
> I feel this should be fixed. I don't know if this can be done auto-
> matically, or a manual community effort is required. My proposal would
> be to select "user=Firefishy  maxspeed=60 highway=unclassified" in JOSM
> and change all to residential. Now, a few roads that should be
> unclassified will be residential, but the ratio seems to be 99% wrong
> now vs. 1% wrong after this change. Of course, roads that have been
> touched since the import will missed by this, but there will be an
> improvement for sure.
>
> Another thing that I noticed is that the roads are massively over-noded.
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/32216567 demonstrates both. It
> should be residential, and if you compare to aerial images, the straight
> section is represented with 6 nodes, 3 of them within 5m. I presume this
> comes from calculating the centerline of a full shape, as the road widens
> towards the east, where the many nodes are.
> (I would map that road with 3 nodes, with the two on the eastern sides
> interfacing between the NW-SE road, going away at 90° from there. I.e.
> making a slight right turn when going east. The data is just the opposite,
> going to the left, which gives an odd angle that is not there in reality
> when you come from the south and turn east.)
>
> I downloaded a section of Cape Town, exported to GPX and used gpsbabel
> to apply the Douglas-Pecker algorithm with 1m max deviation. The number
> of nodes went down to less than half! So maybe removing some excess nodes
> could be performed during any update.
>
> Best,
> David
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ZA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ZA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za

Reply via email to