Thanks Grant, I prefer the newer imagery as well. The blurry part is very narrow and I don't think it would be a good idea to only replace a narrow part with older imagery, unless you could easily identify backgrounds as being from different times.
Regards On 18 February 2013 01:51, Grant Slater <openstreet...@firefishy.com> wrote: > On 17 February 2013 23:01, Gerhardus Geldenhuis > <gerhardus.geldenh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > There is some places where the CD:NGI imagery is blurry as if the > airplane > > went through turbulence. Is this a problem with the data or a problem > with > > our transformation of it? Also is this something we should fed back to > NGI? > > > > It is an issue with the original imagery. Where given the choice > between older (and possibly better) or newer imagery I always selected > the newer imagery. > If a list of areas is compiled, I can look at swapping the imagery to > older imagery if available. > I'm unsure if NGI would like feedback, some of the imagery they > provided us is very much in beta. > > / Grant > -- Gerhardus Geldenhuis
_______________________________________________ Talk-ZA mailing list Talk-ZA@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za
