Hi Sam:

I am contacting you in a non-private manner, as I am interested in
obtaining a non-losey copy of Foobar. I've tried version 0.9, and yesw,
it does lose. You can't even stream stuff by default without downloading
some plugins. Er, bad?

I'm really getting annoyed with Winamp, ya know. Every version uses
loads and lots more memory, and has tons of unnecessary stuff. At the
moment, I'm running Winamp version 2.80 with some of the newer plugins
for compatibility of formats that it doesn't support by default, such as
AAC+, and the adition of the Global Hotkeys plugin, which sort of
half-way works on this here old version of winamp.


I want to eventually broadcast using Foobar, assuming a better way to
crossfade is found since the default one, at least according to a very
old instance of you, seems to lose.

On 7/17/2006, 12:05:12 PM EDT, Samuel wrote:

> Yes, and yes.  But 0.9 sucks; email me privately for an earlier
> version.  The advantages of foobar include:
> 1.  no AOL nonsense
> 2.  no spyware
> 3.  better sound quality
> 4.  dsp stacking without a third party plugin
> 5.  less memory use
> 6.  better playlist handling
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: RAYMOND GAY 
>   To: talk2 
>   Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 5:24 PM
>   Subject: The Talk2 List foobar2000


>   Hi,
>   I was wondering, does anyone here use foobar2000?
>   Is it better than winamp?
>   Thanks, Ray.

>    
>   "Falling is easy
>   It's getting back up that becomes the problem
>   And if you believe you can find a way out
>   Then you've solved the problem"(staind, "falling"



-- -- 
Patrick Perdue (MCP, CNA)
KE4DYI
Greensboro, NC
website: http://www.pdaudio.net
home: +1(828)221-2971
Mobile phone and SMS: +1(336)509-5583
e-mail and .net messenger: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------
For anything related to the yamaha motif line of keyboards and
modules, subscribe to the motif-help mailing list by sending a
blank message to:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


This message originally sent in reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, July 17, 
2006 at 7:33 PM EST.


Reply via email to