FWIW we jumped on the puppet bandwagon as 3.x came out ... 2.x looked bad..
and 3.x was, after some jiggling, understandable. ( it looks like we were
able to skip over some of the headaches of 2.x  , and dothings the 3.x way
).

David

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Jason Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:

> We've recently rolled out puppet 4.2 for a new environment at work,
> instead of continuing w/ our puppet 2.7 rabbit hole.  I must say that I
> quite like 4.2, particularly that puppetlabs added top down ordering of
> manifests, which makes writing manifests much more predictable!
>
> We've not attempted a 2.7->4.2 migration, but I sense it coming in the
> future.  We have forklifted some 2.7 modules over to 4.2 without too much
> headache.  Variable scoping changes, so we had to watch out for that.
>
> -jason
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, David Thornton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I am flabberghasted at how different it all is.
>>
>> is it worth it ?
>>
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>> ---
>> Talk Mailing List
>> [email protected]
>> http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>
> ---
> Talk Mailing List
> [email protected]
> http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
---
Talk Mailing List
[email protected]
http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to