Of the 2 articles, I think the Globe is closer to the mark. I largely trust openmedia.ca on this and other IP issues, and they've been VERY strongly against it. Most recently: https://openmedia.org/en/tpp-long-road-fairer-copyright
../Dave On 27 December 2015 at 23:57, John Moniz <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/27/2015 11:04 PM, Alex Volkov wrote: > >> Ugh. The article starts with good ol' jingoism and then proceed not to >> give a single citation of the TPP, condensing to just bunch of >> paraphrasing taken out of context. Not that the TPP doesn't have its >> problems but this is really not a good piece of journalism. >> >> Planet money gave much better and way less panicky explanation of the TPP >> -- >> http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2015/11/06/455055023/episode-662-omg-tpp >> >> Alex. >> >> > Reading the comments it seems that many people didn't think very highly of > Planet Money's journalism on this piece either. > > On 26/12/15 08:17 PM, Stephen wrote: >> >>> Scary stuff actually. >>> >>> The agreement is to benefit existing corporations and stifle new >>> initiatives. >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/trans-pacific-partnership-is-a-wonderful-idea-for-china/article27939142/ >>> >>> >> --- >> Talk Mailing List >> [email protected] >> http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >> > > --- > Talk Mailing List > [email protected] > http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >
--- Talk Mailing List [email protected] http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
