On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:54:30PM -0400, Michael Hill via talk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Lennart Sorensen via talk <[email protected]> > > Well the snap containers do sound interesting. It seems to solve > > the problem of having the right library versions for a given task. > > Of course I also wonder if this doesn't create the problem of how to > > update insecure libraries that distributions tried to solve in the first > > place by only having oen shared copy of a given library to update. > > Maybe they have some concept of using system libraries for some things. > > I haven't checked the details that much on it yet. > > As long as you don't get your information from the press release: > > https://www.happyassassin.net/2016/06/16/on-snappy-and-flatpak-business-as-usual-in-the-canonical-propaganda-department/
Yeah that pretty much matches what I thought was the state of things. -- Len Sorensen --- Talk Mailing List [email protected] https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
