Why secondary at all.

If your mail server is down then queuing up mail for later deliver happens on the client mail servers.

So long as your mail server is not down for days or weeks and at that point the mail will bounce back.

It will likely bounce back from a secondary mx if it is on hold that long also.

The downside of an external mx secondary is that is in essence becomes an open relay for your primary mail server unless you install spam filtering on the server.

I ran some secondary servers for people and found in the long run they were more pain than they were worth.


If your determined to run a secondary then you could put up a version of postfix on a virtual or container hosting service like Amazon,Google,1&1 ....



On 10/30/2016 08:51 PM, Dave Cramer via talk wrote:
Steve,

All I'm looking for is someone to handle 4 domains as the 2nd mx. This means they forward to the primary as long as the primary is up.

thanks for the detail, but this needn't be so complicated

Dave Cramer

On 30 October 2016 at 20:38, Steve Petrie, P.Eng. <apet...@aspetrie.net <mailto:apet...@aspetrie.net>> wrote:

    Hello Dave,

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Cramer via talk"
    <talk@gtalug.org <mailto:talk@gtalug.org>>
    To: "GTALUG" <talk@gtalug.org <mailto:talk@gtalug.org>>
    Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 8:04 PM
    Subject: [GTALUG] looking for a secondary mx service


        I have 4 domains that I need a secondary mx service for.

        Suggestions?


    Not sure what you mean by " secondary" mx service, but if you're
    asking for suggestions for a good email hosting service, I can
    recommend SiteGround www.siteground.com <http://www.siteground.com>

    * * *
    * * *

    I was using AT&T for many many years for my email hosting
    (inherited them when IBM sold off their email hosting service
    (ibmglobal.net <http://ibmglobal.net>) to AT&T.

    Was never happy with AT&T. Some beautiful screw-ups ... Plus
    absurdly know-nothing AT&T technical "support" people.

    Wanted for a long time to switch from my apet...@attglobal.net
    <mailto:apet...@attglobal.net> email address to my own domain name
    apet...@aspetrie.net <mailto:apet...@aspetrie.net> but was
    intimidated by the amount of work this would entail.

    Then AT&T did me a huge favour, by announcing many months in
    advance, the planned termination of their existing attglobal.net
    <http://attglobal.net> email hosting service.

    * * *
    * * *

    The upside of using one's own email domain name, of course, is
    that once it's set up, and all the work is done of: 1. informing
    your list of recipients, and 2. updating every place on the
    Internet, where you are registered using your email address as
    your identifier,

    is that in the future, if you are unhappy with your email hosting
    service, you can switch to a new email hosting provider without
    having to go through all the work emtailed in changing the email
    address. Because, of course, the email address stays the same. You
    just point your MX records to the new service provider, and say
    "bye bye" to the old service provider.

    * * *
    * * *

    Once AT&T announced their planned email service shutdown, I spent
    a huge amount of time researching email hosting service providers

    I tested three different email hosting services (going to the
    trouble of setting up a test domain for each, and sending and
    receiving test messages) and walked way from every one, for one
    reason or another. Most;ly because of the lack of quality
    technical support. It's a jungle out there !! But you already know
    that.

    I actually went to live production email operation with the second
    of these three providers, and used them for my production email
    for a few months. But I decided not to stay with them, because I
    didn't like the attitude of their tech support people. They were
    technically very competent, but seemed to take a confrontational
    approach to clients.

    So I kept searching, and after almost giving up, I settled on
    www.siteground.com <http://www.siteground.com> Made the switchover
    to SG on 2 July 2015. No regrets yet ...

    * * *
    * * *

    SiteGround (SG) are actually focused on website hosting, not email
    hosting. But they happen to offer email hosting (SMTP, IMAP, POP3)
    as part of their web hosting packages. I haven't set up a website
    at SG yet, but I did create an FTP account on SG for someone I'm
    working with. That works fine, too.

    I have been very happy with SG. Their technical support is
    excellent. Works through a good ticketing system. The staff are
    very knowledgeable and very responsive. Very literate, too. Always
    (so far) giving complete correct answers, using connected
    sentences. Nailed the usual startup problems very quickly.

    The only times I have actually had recourse to SG tech support
    was: 1. during the original switchover to SG, 2. when an email I
    sent was rejected by the SG SMTP server, because it had more than
    40 recipients, and 3. when I upgraded the SG hosting plan so I
    could send an email to more than 40 recipients.

    The SG help pages and FAQ I have found to be useful. Love the CPANEL.

    And of course the main thing -- never had any email service down
    time (yet) with SG.

    * * *
    * * *

    SG are not the cheapest provider, but I long ago stopped looking
    for the cheapest service of any kind on the Internet. I'm very
    focused on value for money. And in my opinion, SG give excellent
    value for the money they charge.

    Naturally, you will need to do your own research. SG don't do
    short-term deals. And if you go with SG, your results may differ ...

    Hope this helps.

    Steve

    apet...@aspetrie.net <mailto:apet...@aspetrie.net>
    (905) 847-3253 <tel:%28905%29%20847-3253>

    P.S. One rule I follow with hosting services. I always use a
    different provider for DNS hosting (in my case it's Namecheap),
    than for the Internet server (e.g. website, email, ftp) hosting.

    If I run into a dispute with the (e.g. website, email, ftp) server
    hosting service, I don't want them to be able to cause me grief by
    holding my DNS registration setup to ransom. This split makes it a
    little more complicated (you don't get the same slick DNS
    integration, if you e.g. upgrade your hosting service plan, and
    this points you to a server with a different IP address).

    But in my opinion, the complete independence of control over the
    DNS setup is well worth the extra complication.


        Dave Cramer



    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


        ---
        Talk Mailing List
        talk@gtalug.org <mailto:talk@gtalug.org>
        https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
        <https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk>





---
Talk Mailing List
talk@gtalug.org
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

--
Alvin Starr                   ||   voice: (905)513-7688
Netvel Inc.                   ||   Cell:  (416)806-0133
al...@netvel.net              ||

---
Talk Mailing List
talk@gtalug.org
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to