On 2017-09-06 10:22 AM, Steve Petrie, P.Eng. via talk wrote: > > Rignt on about ext2/3/4. After much research, my design for the linux > disk drive partitioning for the desktop PC uses a blend of all three: > ext2, ext3, ext4.
There's really no advantage in using anything *but* ext4 out of these: ext2 and ext3 are essentially older, less-journally versions of the same idea. There might be a niche that could favour one of the older ext* FSs, but I haven't found it. And here's me old enough to remember the extfs/xiafs war, too. Not that age adds anything here but an increasing inability to read small print. > DFLY (and HAMMER!) seems to have an enthusiastic (but very small) user > base. Sounds just like BSD, then. /drops mic … --- Talk Mailing List [email protected] https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
