On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:25 AM, David Mason via talk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12 December 2017 at 08:48, o1bigtenor via talk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> A little tidbit for you as you continue your praise of the 'new' ff! (Yes >> I understand >> that chromium isn't ff but they both suffer under the same kind of >> programming >> - - - at least IMO!). >> > > Which is exactly what ff57's use of Rust addresses. > > >> Michael Gilbert <[email protected]> >> 5:03 AM (2 hours ago) >> to debian-securit. >> > > Of the 17 Chrome vulnerabilities listed, 7 would never have happened if > they were using Rust instead of C++. > > Sorry Dave - - - - I'm finding your posts actually quite funny. I have found browsers to be this fairly useless things that purport to do x and don't do it even tolerably and when I forward a list of security issues you tell me that 'some' of them wouldn't be there if they used programming language x (or is it y or z or does it matter?). As long as they have these ever reoccurring list of security issues - - - well they ALL suck - - - fair enough? Dee
--- Talk Mailing List [email protected] https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
