Perhaps because it is not present?
Karen
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Dave Cramer wrote:
Karen,
Apparently sarcasm doesn't come through email very well.
Dave Cramer
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 18:01, Karen Lewellen via talk <[email protected]>
wrote:
What makes it universally fun to sensor people? you indicate you know it
is fun...why?
I point that out because as your example illustrates generalizations tend
to make no sense, and fun must be at least understandable as fun no?
Kare
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Malgosia Askanas via talk wrote:
So let me understand this. If a woman (me, for example) would bemoan
the
fact that 80% of participants in a certain field of endeavor are male,
that's
not gender discrimination, right? (I assume it isn't, since it goes on
all
the time in all kinds of media, without any visible censorship.) But if
a
man bemoans the fact that 80% of participants in (another) field of
endeavor
are female, that's gender discrimination? To my mind, labeling the
latter as
"gender discrimination seems like... gender discrimination. Or is it
that,
by definition, censoring a man cannot possibly be gender discrimination?
I know it is fun to censor people, but isn't it *more* fun to do it for
reasons that make sense?
-malgosia
---
Talk Mailing List
[email protected]
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
---
Talk Mailing List
[email protected]
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
---
Talk Mailing List
[email protected]
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
