On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 08:00:10 -0400 David Collier-Brown via talk <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2019-09-19 11:11 p.m., William Park via talk wrote: > > I just tried kernel 5.3.0, and it's noticeably faster in opening > > windows. Not sure about overall throughput, though. > I'd be interested in how quick it is in unblocking processes who just > got I/O. I have servers doing arrays of heavily parallel network > requests who race each other to get back, but /then / compete to get > a core to service them. > --dave > Please do accept my apology in advance, I do not mean or intend to hijack an existing thread, but I have noticed something interesting in the email you just sent to the list, so I have started a new thread... :)
Your sent email, came in marked as SPAM, and I wondered why... yes, it is from Google, who sends a lot of spam, scams etc. but that alone should not get it marked as spam... So, I looked and it is so interesting... (maybe I need a life :) ) Dave, in the headers you literally have three email addresses: Relayed For: <[email protected]> - No SPF / Anti Forgery Cc:<[email protected]> - Which is currently a -> ~all Reply-To: [email protected] and your SpamCop receive only addy, also a -> ~all Which is why your relay is scored additional, as this is also what spammers do very frequently (They use (rather abuse) @gmail with a reply to of @outlook.com, etc) It is also interesting, that Google, probably in the interests of becoming a better netizen?, has again started including relay headers, again, after not including same for a long while... Anyway, long winded, but here is the question: Do you not find many fake sent from and backscatter issues to your @rogers.com? If yes, why even still use it in your Thunderbird config? Andre --- Post to this mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
