On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:13:11 -0400 Alvin Starr <[email protected]> wrote: <snip so many cool things around here somewhere> > > How about DNS over TOR? > as usual, LOVE the way you think :)
How about just plain old DNSSEC? (instead of a nanny) - yay, IT Works! - and is so mature already...(without all the risks of having/using a nanny) and using connectivity providers (instead of third parties and dns over https) -- for caching/recursive, like Bell (Bell CA actually does not track/record/monetise their users DNS querries afaik) Problems all solved? > > > > my further opinions are that any "nanny" type "free" service where > > someone else decides what and where i may or may not go or what i > > may or may not see, needs to be either well > > regulated/controlled/open/published/etc or simply not be > > accepted... > > Sometimes nannies are good things. yes, nannies are 'sometimes' good things, but for some people BAD nannies are sometimes even better :) > People without the wherewithal or interest in managing their own > security likely are in need of a nanny. > again, dnssec already protects users, it just needs wider adoption, which is the issue.. .as for "shared" domains like outlook.com - abuse management costs will increase? - which is probably why dnssec has never caught on, it is not "sexy" (like some nannies...) > > > > anyway, i am probably a minority as i also do not like/use/support > > very popular and world dominating services such as 'whatsapp' and i > > do not tweet or post photos of my food on insta and i have zero > > tiktok vids > I have a feeling your take is not a minority on this list. ooh, warm & fuzzies to you too, I have a home *sigh* :) --- Post to this mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
