On 8/27/20 9:44 AM, Mauro Souza via talk wrote:
If you have a VPS, or a co-located server, or something like that, and
unlimited bandwidth, SIA and Storj are good to pass some time. The
economics aren't on the side of the storage owners, but on the storage
renters. It's so cheap that you can rent a terabyte on both networks,
and use it for double backups. I stored maybe 200GB of data for a
year, and maybe made 10 cents. Maybe less. And as an earlier adopter,
I earned some hundreds of GB for free that I never used.
The problem was not so much that it was using up my 25MB that I am
running at home but that it was hogging ALL my bandwidth causing
congestion problems.
I could likely do something with traffic shaping but I was not all that
invested in the project to try to see how to make it workable.
The long term problem is that if I am subjecting my system to the extra
traffic and not getting enough to justify the extra wear and tear on my
disks then why will I put the storage out there.
If the economics don't work in the long run for the storage providers
then those providers will exit the application.
If I remember correctly a number of years ago HP had a storage service
that was hosting LOTS of data for people.
They decided the economics were not in their favor and shut it down
causing huge inconvenience and problems for the customer base.
What do you do when you have a huge data-set with a storage provider
that will take months to move and get told they are closing down before
you can extract all your data?
When Storj/sia take their 30% off the top and then distribute the rest
to the 3 to 5 storage hosters your looking at a vanishingly small return
on your effort.
Combine this with network latency related penalties and the home user
with a few TB of space to share will not be interested sharing the space.
It has been a while since I looked but I never found any business cases
for storage providers.
I don't expect to become the next Jeff Bezos by selling my storage space
but I do want to know that I will cover my costs and make a bit.
I once was toying with this idea of providing low price backup
solution to small businesses, storing data on Storj and SIA at the
same time. Both networks aren't still "production ready", so I would
store on both at the same time, and keep watching if the files are
still available periodically. You only need enough storage to store
all the metadata (client id, file name, size, the hash of it on the
network, etc) on your database. So you could store a petabyte of data
while having a couple GB on your server. The agent would upload
directly to the networks and send you only the data you need to
restore the file later. It can work, storage is not the difficult
part, and the "what changed since last backup?" question is the main
issue.
Since the various services are object stores then why not just store
eachfile as an objects and then keep track of the objects that change.
It would be no better/worse than a regular filesystem backup like dump.
Mauro
http://mauro.limeiratem.com - registered Linux User: 294521
Scripture is both history, and a love letter from God.
Em qui., 27 de ago. de 2020 às 08:37, Alvin Starr via talk
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:
As for Siacoin and Storj I found that they used 100% of my
available internet bandwidth without using any storage.
Luckily for me I opted for "unlimited bandwidth" but not so lucky
for Teksavvy.
So doing something like sharing your few free TB could cost you
big time if you were a Bell or Rogers customer.
I have access to large amounts of excess storage but I have yet to
be convinced that I could even pay for the power that it takes to
spin the drives.
The concept is great but the economics does not seem to be there yet.
---
Post to this mailing [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Unsubscribe from this mailing listhttps://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
--
Alvin Starr || land: (647)478-6285
Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)806-0133
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ||
---
Post to this mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Unsubscribe from this mailing list
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
---
Post to this mailing list [email protected]
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
--
Alvin Starr || land: (647)478-6285
Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)806-0133
[email protected] ||
---
Post to this mailing list [email protected]
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
