I would also add that i've "lived with" Mediawiki for a while, through various upgrades and server moves. It was simple and straightforward.
In a world of increasingly complex systems, a simple system is a joy. David On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 4:02 PM Mike via talk <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2020-10-30 3:34 p.m., David Thornton via talk wrote: > > 3. Mediawiki - my personal fav only because 1. OSS 2. plugable such > > that I can get neat semantic stuff to work. I use categories a lot, I > > use REDIRECT alot. I'm a firm believer in loose pluralism to start and > > rigorous lexicography as time passed. I love that I can do a stand > > alone server deploy of it, a two tier version, a containerized > > version, a cloud version, or a massive scaled out version. I love > > being able to do fancy semantic work in mediawiki. ( see > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_wiki ) > > > I second the semantic mediawiki plug. My group still uses mediawiki > pretty extensively despite having been told that we don't... > > We originally built a lightweight project management environment in it. > We don't make much use of all that semantic power anymore, but even > though our official documentation is elsewhere, the wiki is still our > standard repository of shared (especially miscellaneous) knowledge. I > guess I would say that even though mediawiki is larger than many wiki > implementations, it's nevertheless easy to deploy, and can grow > enormously in complexity if you have the need. > > Mike > > --- > Post to this mailing list [email protected] > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- David Thornton https://wiki.quadratic.net https://github.com/drthornt/ https://twitter.com/northdot9/
--- Post to this mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
