On 4/2/21 5:27 PM, Russell Reiter via talk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, 4:38 PM Dhaval Giani, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> are all aware of. Many women were uncomfortable around RMS and avoided
>> him. Many refused to participate in our community because of
>> interactions with him. Do you think RMS is more important than a
>> community of developers he is pushing away?
>
>
> See all the stuff you say we are all aware in this message is just
rumors and innuendo to me.
>
Wait, so all these women saying those words are rumours and innuendo?
Greetings,
You know what, thats exactly what innuendo is, saying "all these women" without
even a link to a personal quote from them, not a one.
That's a very dangerous to do. Lots of cases of mistreatment against
minorities or other groups historically
aren't reported because of power conflicts. I mean would you really we
comfortable with staying the same
thing if it was happening to children? I'm not stating the facts would hope up
in a court but just stating
to forget about them because there is no trail runs into this problem of power
conflicts. Not to mention
if they are stated then it runs into another problem of being traced back to
them which is a dangerous
in another light. Forgetting about this isn't a good idea.
You choose to disbelieve them? After a pattern of behaviour that
multiple people have confirmed and talked about?
I can't disbelieve that which I can find no record of. What multiple people are
you talking about?
What I can do is check some facts, to the best of my abilities. This link I
came across in my opinion has a more balanced view than yours.
https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/
<https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/>
> What are not rumors and innuendo are the historical facts on IBM, their
influence, their power and powerful friends and most importantly their big ball of
money which they spend on influenceing the influencers.
>
>>
>> I want to explicitly state this. RMS is a major reason free software
>> is where it is. RMS's contributions to free software are gigantic.
>> However, RMS cannot be a leader of our community if he continues to
>> isolate a significant population of prospective developers. RMS the
>> contributor - YES. RMS the leader - NO.
>>
>> RMS cannot be the poster child of our community if it is going to be
>> relevant in the future.
>
>
> This is where being the willing poster child of a charitable
institution, used to raise funds, diverges from the science of truth and
innovation.
>
> In the legal science of truth, a person is innocent until proven guilty
in a court of law. However, media and the media barons in conteol, crucify persons
and their personas daily, just to make a buck.
Sure but again your assuming being guilty in a court of law is better than
being found guilty by the public.
There is lots of evidence that the court system isn't as infallible as you
think it is for both cultural
and other reasons.
>
And no one has charged RMS with a crime. All we are saying is, he is
not representative of a majority of us, and we don't want him to
represent us. Some of us are minorities who have heard racist
statements being made by prominent folks in the community and have
made us feel our contributions are not valued. It is not hard to
believe after that experience that other prominent folks can be
sexist. RMS has not stepped up and owned up to his actions and
apologized. I have no problem with people growing. We all make
mistakes. But doubling down like this, well I don't want to be a part
of that community. And the reality is, there are tons of "other"
people who will not join in and we will never know. So yes, if the
choice is between thousands of those people, having a diverse
community, growing and being relevant to the world, I would rather RMS
step down than us lose this community. And I would rather you leave
the community if you think being more welcoming to other voices is not
important. We don't need your contributions at the risk of alienating
many more people.
Wow that last paragraph was a completely off the wall projection of negative
personal attributes towards RMS without a shred of evidence. I wasnt aware that
Stallman was a deemed racist by association.
Its bad enough that someone on this list deemed him to be an incel. Just type
incel into google and you can see the links to terrorisim.
Again, I restate this. RMS as a contributor - yes. RMS as a leader -
no. He doesn't represent me, and he certainly doesn't represent the
community of foss developers. This is a discussion about RMS, not the
conspiracy theories you are throwing about.
I first came across evidence of survelance capitalisim at a tlug meeting in
2003 or so. So its not a theory to me, it is a fact of the corporation and its
predatory nature in order to make profits for the investors.
What conspiracy theories are you talking about.
Survelance capitalisim is a real thing, funded by real corporations. Stallman
is aware of this and pissed lots of people off by talking about it in public.
Or are you saying IBM didn't develop software and market it to both sides of
the conflict in WW2. Thats not a conspiracy its business as usual for a global
corporation like them.
Just to be clear, IBM weren't the only ones who made money from the holocost.
You should read the quote about remembering the past on this site.
https://www.holocaustcentre.com/HEW <https://www.holocaustcentre.com/HEW>
Coca Cola sold its german equipment to a company now known as Fanta.
Ford motors provided truck engines and parts to germany.
Through a blind company Standard Oil provided their propritarey additive for
gasoline to the Luftwaffe for their planes so they performed better at altitude.
So let me phrase this issue a little differently once again.
What part of the money which IBM used to purchase Red Hat, that came from
investments made by IBM, after they obscenely profited by trading with the
Nazis, is the amount you would be willing to use to fund your work, voluntarily
or paid at Red Hat today.
So that's a logical fallacy Russell you can't just attack someone's opinion by
overextending it like that.
Nick
Dhaval
Russell
“Th’ newspaper does ivrything f’r us. It runs th’ polis foorce an’ th’ banks,
commands th’ milishy, controls th’ ligislachure, baptizes th’ young, marries
th’ foolish, comforts th’ afflicted, afflicts th’ comfortable, buries th’ dead
an’ roasts thim aftherward.” F. P. Dunne
---
Post to this mailing list [email protected]
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
---
Post to this mailing list [email protected]
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
