On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 09:46:47AM -0500, James Knott via talk wrote: > What I'd like to see is some companies, such as Bell, get off their butts > and provide IPv6. By sticking with IPv4, they are holding the Internet > back, through inadequate address space. Even on LTE, where IPv6 is > mandatory, Bell doesn't do it properly. > > I'm on Rogers and have had full IPv6 for years, both Internet and cell > phone. On my home firewall, I get a /56 prefix, which provides 2^72 > addresses, or 256 /64 prefixes. My cell phone also has full IPv6 and can > provide it to tethered devices in a /64 prefix. In fact, to access IPv4 > sites, my phone has to use 464XLAT to convert from IPv6 to IPv4.
How stable is the IPv6 address block you get from Rogers? I know in the past their IPv4 addresses rarely changed. I figure I ought to start figuring out what's involved with Rogers setup these days given that's what I will end up with next September when I move to a new house. I am pretty sure a new development won't have any copper phone or cable connections, just fiber, and rogers service is included in the price of the house for the first year, so I figure I might as well use it. And I suppose I will have to figure out how one runs a router and APs on top of whatever device rogers uses to connect to their network. -- Len Sorensen --- Post to this mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
