Nate Abele wrote:
Ken, any reason you wouldn't just generate _javascript_ to be eval'd on the client side? Only inertia :) The code we have works, so I've kind of gone on to other things. I would think that would actually be more efficient, despite the use of eval(). It also saves you from having to re-implement more _javascript_ language features, should you choose to expand your dynamic capabilities. Also, (and the likelihood of this may be a little far-fetched), it insulates you against having your client side code misinterpret control character sequences embedded in the text.Thanks for indulging my curiosities. -NateDate: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 15:02:57 -0500 From: Kenneth Downs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] So who's using Ajax anway? To: NYPHP Talk <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" David Mintz wrote: |
begin:vcard fn:Kenneth Downs n:Downs;Kenneth adr;dom:;;347 Main Street;East Setauket;NY;11733 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:631-689-7200 tel;fax:631-689-0527 tel;cell:631-379-0010 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.secdat.com version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online http://www.nyphpcon.com Show Your Participation in New York PHP http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
