Hi Nate, Could you supply us with the benchmarks you've cited? I'm curious to see them and I'm sure others are as well.
Thanks, Tom http://www.liphp.org On Jan 19, 2008 9:25 AM, Nate Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Anirudh Zala wrote: > > > >> When you move from medium to large scale projects, Symfony starts > >> getting > >> restricted. For example there is no native support to handle > >> replication of > >> database hence you left stumped that what to do. > >> > >> Fortunately there is plugin to do so. But it has also it's > >> limitations. It > >> supports only 1 master and many slave type of replication. Hence if > >> you need > >> to handle multiple masters and slaves then you have no other way > >> except > >> modifying that plugin. > > > > Define "large". > > > Okay. How about an application that more than 5 of my closest friends > can use at the same time? So far, all benchmarks indicate that > Symfony is about *half as fast as Rails*. You take APC out of the > equation, and it's about an 8th as fast as Rails (in terms of rps). > > Getting back to the OP, in terms of speed, you're better off going > with pretty much anything but Symfony. Heck, you'd probably be better > off re-implementing PHP itself in PHP (oh wait, that's Smarty). For > simple templating, nothing beats PHP itself, which is why I'd > recommend something like Savant. > > _______________________________________________ > New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List > http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online > http://www.nyphpcon.com > > Show Your Participation in New York PHP > http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php > _______________________________________________ New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online http://www.nyphpcon.com Show Your Participation in New York PHP http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
