on 2008-04-14 10:24 Jake McGraw said the following:
I'd only keep the last two questions:
9) Why use Flash in web development? Why not?
10) Why is "separation of style and content" recommended in web
development?
Having been on the interviewer side of the desk many many times --
interviewing well over 100 people for operations, development, and other
positions -- I have to respectfully disagree.
2 years of experience on a résumé doesn't really translate into that
much, and two years of experience might really have been two times one
year of experience, and the person might have been pigeonholed into one
small area, or only have been using do-everything-for-you tools...
I have found that many people do NOT gain much general exposure.
Nonetheless, these last two questions are good, and should be included
as well to allow candidates to show their stuff since they're open-ended.
I think the other questions would be incredibly ineffective in
determining the abilities of a possible employee. All of them could be
picked up in a matter of hours, while the knowledge and experience
And yet, you'd like to know that someone you're hiring with "several
years' experience" doesn't have to learn his ABCs and 123s also.
If this were a ten-year veteran, I'd still want some few basic-skill
questions, to make sure that he's still in touch, but obviously I'd want
to know more about more advanced things; more strategy than tactics, as
it were.
required to answer the last two questions is a far better indicator of
of a talented developer. Also, an inability to answer any one of the
CSS questions wouldn't necessarily be an indication of lack of talent,
I think it took me quite a few months to stop checking my CSS cheat
sheet before I memorized Top Right Bottom Left!
I don't believe that any test of this nature should be strictly
disqualifying; anyone who uses these blindly (like giving them to an HR
person and saying "ditch below 70%" automatically) doesn't do himself as
much good. If you're accustomed to reading résumés, and you're doing
phone interviews
(http://www.jbaltz.com/weblog/2006/10/phone_screens_redux_1.html) (in
fact, using this type of quiz as part of a phone screen!) you'd be able
to winnow out the clowns much earlier.
Any webmaster/developer with two REAL (full time tech company) years
of experience would be able to have a much more in depth conversation
about web design philosophy, best practices and commonly accepted
I think you put too much faith in time-in-grade. To those of us with
more than a decade of experience doing the same thing, two years just
isn't that much :-)
That isn't to say that the questions originally posted aren't a bit
picayune, only that the idea of a basic-skills test for lower-level (1-3
years experience) is actually a sound one. "I'd just google it" means
that the candidate just doesn't have THAT much experience in actually
*doing* it. (Lord knows that I don't run to google for every little
lookup, I've got sites I already know and have at my fingertips for
mundane tasks, like oddball CSS recipes.)
- jake
//jbaltz
--
jerry b. altzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.jbaltz.com
thank you for contributing to the heat death of the universe.
_______________________________________________
New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
http://www.nyphpcon.com
Show Your Participation in New York PHP
http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
