At 6:12 AM -0400 8/27/08, Peter Sawczynec wrote:
What is it? How come we can financially, socially and medically network
the entire world including gadgets and games and calendars that
instantly recall and matrix all your comments and whatever, everything
you and all your dispersed friends care to catalog. But we cannot, just
cannot for some reason create a single working accurate voting
tabulation system. Just what (What?) is that issue?
Warmest regards,
Peter Sawczynec
Peter:
There are all sorts of problems with this and some you would not
believe -- for example it is against the law to claim that a voting
scheme did not work (past tense). I had an associate who ran for a
public office, lost, but was not allowed to publicly claim that the
process was flawed, or how it was flawed. The law has something about
undermining the election process. The public can't lose faith in te
system.
Another problem is that half the people are below average
intelligence. So whatever scheme you develop, it has to be idiot
proof -- and as we all know, we are developing a better idiot every
day -- just look at Congress.
Another problem is one of suspicion -- neither party wants the
possibility that the other part may have somehow out smarted them and
rigged the election. And more importantly, neither party wants the
possibility that a third party may actually prevail. So it's best to
keep the graft obvious to both sides so that they can maintain
control collectively.
Remember, by presenting us with two choices gives the illusion that
we have a choice. You can have any flavor you want provided it's
chocolate or vanilla (no implication re the current presidential
race).
Another problem is that there are companies who have all governments
(local, state and federal) in their pocket via lobbying and the
"good-old-boy" clubs -- they do not want to lose the business,
regardless of IF they can fix the problem or not. Unfortunately, most
of these companies are better at lobbying and landing contracts than
actually getting things to work.
Another problem is that the people in charge (I've seen this locally)
actually believe that they are knowledgeable re the details of the
problem. And in using their divine insight they have full control and
understanding over all the buzzwords provided to them via lobbyist.
The people in charge are simply talking heads operated by the
invested interest behind the curtains.
So all in all, the voting problem is not hard to solve -- it's easy!
It's the system behind the scenes that's really the problem.
Now, do I sound cynical, or do I just understand the problem more than most?
Cheers,
tedd
--
-------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
_______________________________________________
New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
http://www.nyphpcon.com
Show Your Participation in New York PHP
http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
