> Just out of curosity, do you disagree with the syntax of static > function, or just not understand their purpose? Can you suggest a > syntax you would prefer? The syntax btw is taken from C++. It is > obtuse on one hand, but on the other hand its immediatly clear your > calling a static function for a class and not a member function of an > object.
Oh, I don't disagree with the syntax, I was just saying I'd reached the end of what I could figure out myself, and needed some help. The problem I've run into is that my knowledge carries me to the last third of most PHP intro books I've looked at. Hardly seems worth the money. Corey // Corey H Maass Gelform Design Brooklyn, NY Print and web design for art and business em [EMAIL PROTECTED] ww http://www.gelform.com ph 646/228.5048 fx 866/502.4861 IM gelform _______________________________________________ New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online http://www.nyphpcon.com Show Your Participation in New York PHP http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
