At 9:38 AM -0700 10/6/09, Kristina Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, David Krings wrote:
> There
> really is no need to store the same piece of data more than once in
a
> database.
But a table descrbing a manay-to-many could just contain foreign keys.
--
Aj.
Exactly, the table would contain probably nothing more than a primary
key autonumber field, the user id and account id in each row.
Creating a view is an option, but I have concerns about how it would
scale in a situation where a lot of accounts were being created.
Kristina
Kristina
Oh no -- there's two of you! :-)
Cheers,
tedd
--
-------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
_______________________________________________
New York PHP Users Group Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
http://www.nyphp.org/Show-Participation
