On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Justin Dearing <zippy1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:17 AM, David Krings <ram...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> >>> Just being curious and sorry for digressing, but which requirements would >>> that be? Running commodity tasks on the most expensive server OS with the >>> worst web server available? > > With an attitude like that, businesses must be busting down your door > begging you to migrate them from ASP.NET on IIS to PHP. > This is 2010, and windows doesn't suck like it used to. Yes I'll there is no > "I will do all the work myself because I have no cash and plenty of time" > option for windows, so you're paying $469 for your server OS minimum > (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/pricing.aspx). However, > unless you are a one man shop running one server and one workstation, you > probably have some sort of Technet subscription, or the equivalent for your > OS.
PHP on IIS will get better soon, see: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/25/dziuba_microsoft_php/ However, why anyone would choose any part of the MS stack to host their LAMP app is beyond me. Ubuntu Server w/ LAMP takes about 20 minutes to install and works wonderfully out of the box is free and incredibly well maintained. - jake > Justin > _______________________________________________ > New York PHP Users Group Community Talk Mailing List > http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > http://www.nyphp.org/Show-Participation > _______________________________________________ New York PHP Users Group Community Talk Mailing List http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk http://www.nyphp.org/Show-Participation
