On 5/3/2012 5:29 AM, Petros Ziogas wrote:
What companies like Mozilla fail to consider is that by dancing around video
formats and standards all they do is kill the little guys.

Hi!

The reason for Mozilla's dance was that they wanted a video codec to be added to HTML5 that is royalty free so that the codec required by HTML5 is as open as the standard itself. But first Apple and then Microsoft were strictly against that and as usual for monetary reasons. I agree that finally picking any one codec is needed, although I'd liked that this doesn't become as a barrier of entrance for any new browser vendors. Because they now need to pay up in order to support that codec. In all that discussion always keep in mind that HTML5 is NOT an approved standard. So why get all worked up about things that aren't even final yet. I know that reality is different. The major browser vendors already implemented their own interpretation of partial HTML5, which is right back to the 'works only on browser X' problems of the past. I blame the standards for that, because they (intentionally) only describe the markup, but not the end result. As you already pointed out, if you want something to look and work the same in every browser use Flash. Unfortunately, Flash got a bad rap over the years, partially self-inflicted, but mainly because irresponsible web designers plastered page after page with Flash. Silverlight never got off the ground and is all but canned by Microsoft. Fast forward a year or two when Flash is banned and all you got are a bag of screws called HTML5 we will also say goodbye to RIA and cloud apps. That change is already done in the mobile area, there you mainly find only fat clients. Even popular 'cloud' services require you to download a client app.

As far as ease of use and user experience we are currently making big steps backwards.

David
_______________________________________________
New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

http://www.nyphp.org/show-participation

Reply via email to