Agreed. Personally I would like to see a cross section of frameworks and methods. Symfony2, ZF2, Laravel are all in the same "enterprise" category. It would be educational to have some microframeworks (i.e. Slim, Silex) for comparison. Perhaps even gong so far as to have frameworks that use push vs. pull (components) for the View layer, and url dispatch vs traversal for routing. Just to show different techniques. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_application_framework
On Feb 14, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Federico Ulfo wrote: > Hi everyone, let's wrap things up: we have speakers and space, now we need > good arguments, such as success stories or new tools/frameworks. > > Just wanted to add that I'm not interested in old frameworks just for the > sake of knowing them, unless there's a success story behind it. I'd > personally like to hear about current frameworks (Symfony2, ZF2, Laravel, > etc.), and mainstream methodology and tools (e.g. Composer). Let me know what > you guys think! > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:39 AM, David Mintz <da...@davidmintz.org> wrote: > [snip] > > Surely someone will stand up for Zend Framework 2, or no? I would like to see > somebody justify the mind-boggling complexity of it. > > > -- > David Mintz > http://davidmintz.org/ > Fight for social equality: > http://socialequality.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List > http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > http://www.nyphp.org/show-participation > > _______________________________________________ > New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List > http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > http://www.nyphp.org/show-participation
_______________________________________________ New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk http://www.nyphp.org/show-participation
