You know there is a WordPerfect for windows, or there has been -- I
still use it occasionally.

Paulette Vickery via Talk <[email protected]> wrote:

> Bravo! Well said! The thing I miss most about Word Perfect is the ability to
> do a backward search. Now why didn't MS Word do that?
> 
> Paulette
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Dave via Talk
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:55 AM
> To: David Goldfield; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Seeking Your Input
> 
> Hey, I would like to see Access return to Word Perfect.  I once used Word
> Perfect all the time, then about 15 years ago, had to switch over to the
> Dark Side and use MS Word.  I still use Word, but could say that I still
> miss Word Perfect and the way it operated.
> 
> I know that MS Word is the dominate Word Processor on the Market, and has
> been for a while now.  Never the less, with the interface changing in Word
> about every other edition, it is difficult to buy their next copy knowing
> you are going to need to re-learn a lot of what you knew well in their
> previous edition.
> 
> MS Word 2003 had the same look and feel of most of the editions of MS Word,
> going back to the DOS Days.  Then some Bright and Rising Star at Microsoft
> decided it would be a good thing to change Word.  We the public were offered
> MS Word 2007, where everything was changed, forcing people to hunt around
> for features and commands that once were automatic, but now were hidden away
> in some dark corner of the newest edition.
> 
> the next edition was MS Word 2010, which again rebuilt the interface,
> forcing everyone to yet again learn the new layout in MS Word.  I am still
> stumbling around in MS Word 2010.  then 2013 came along, and Word 365 which
> has changed the interface yet again.
> 
> When it comes to computers, and the software that runs on them, most
> customers want reliability, and they want consistency in the program design.
> 
> Most computer users are not using a computer because they love dinking
> around with computers, but are using one because it is to be an assistive
> tool, that helps them to be more productive.
> 
> having to relearn drastically altered interfaces is not what the General
> Public Dreams of doing.
> 
> So when Microsoft comes along with a brand new edition of Office, the first
> thing all of us ask is, is it going to be Accessible?  And if so, will it be
> more accessible than the previous edition, or will we be losing some
> accessibility.
> 
> Today,  all Word Processors I know of, allow the user to Save their 
> Documents in the MS Word file format.    So whether you use Word 
> Perfect, or Open Office, or some other Processor, is not as isolating as it
> once was.
> 
> Since Microsoft is planning to release their new Windows 10 sometime in
> July.  Anyone know if they will be releasing a new edition of MS 
> Office?   Office 2015?
> 
> 
> 
> Getting back to offering support for another Word Processor. . . I am 
> all for it.  Whether it is Open Office, or even Word Perfect, having 
> alternatives would be nice.  Since I am no longer a Working Stiff, I 
> find my own funds are now limited, and the thought of going out and 
> buying a copy of MS Office does not seem like something I will be 
> choosing to afford.
> 
> At 12:37 AM 5/29/2015, you wrote:
> >As I'm adding a fifth suggestion to my initial list, does this mean 
> >I'm pleading the fifth?
> >
> >Seriously, I totally agree with this request about support for 
> >LibreOffice. I realize that AI Squared is partnering with Microsoft. 
> >I realize that Microsoft Office is a major Microsoft product and, 
> >for many reasons, it is essential that Window-Eyes remains better 
> >than competitive by offering the best access to Office as we can 
> >get. I get that and agree with it. However, one of the reasons for 
> >why I broke down and purchased Office 365 at home was because, if 
> >I'm going to be honest, Office offers me the best accessibility for 
> >document creation and editing. I'm sure Microsoft is quite pleased 
> >with this fact. I also feel no malice toward them for their products 
> >or for the way they are being marketed and distributed. The fact is 
> >that Microsoft Word is a darn good product, is used by a lot of 
> >people and screen readers need to support it. However, Office should 
> >not be the only choice available to us. Some people just can't 
> >afford it. Some can but don't feel that they should have to pay for 
> >a decent word processor and I'm in that camp. I love the philosophy 
> >of open source, not just because many open source packages are free 
> >but because they are written and supported by a community, rather 
> >than a corporation, which has some advantages over Microsoft Word. 
> >Although Window-Eyes isn't such a product, the scripting/app 
> >development aspect brings that community involvement to Window-Eyes 
> >and you guys do it better than your competition. Having said that, 
> >we need to see equal support for LibreOffice, or at least as much as 
> >can be implemented if there are limitations caused by the software. 
> >I can tell you that the Document Foundation, which produces and 
> >distributes LibreOffice, is interested in accessibility-related 
> >feedback and would probably be happy to work with AI Squared in 
> >helping to make Window-Eyes work just as well with Writer as it does 
> >with Word. This would open up good word processing to many more of 
> >your users and would make Window-Eyes stand apart from the 
> >competition if we could have the same level of support with 
> >LibreOffice/OpenOffice as we do with Word.
> >
> >
> >Please read about the petition to allow Sister Diana Momenka, a 
> >persecuted Iraqi Christian, to visit the United States
> >http://bit.ly/1IYJjMu
> >Feel free to visit my Web site
> >http://www.davidgoldfield.info
> >
> >                  David Goldfield,
> >         Assistive Technology Specialist
> >
> >On 5/29/2015 2:54 AM, Micallef Michael at FITA via Talk wrote:
> >>Hi Jeremy,
> >>
> >>My wish list include:
> >>
> >>1. Better support for Mozilla products especially Thunderbird Mail 
> >>(basically mouse navigation)
> >>2. the ability to import/export window-eyes settings
> >>3. better support for non-microsoft products such as open office 
> >>and Liber office so we the end users have better choice.
> >>4. better labelling graphics capability (the insert+g when finish 
> >>labelling does not tells you how many labels it found and how many 
> >>manage to really label them).
> >>5. better support for the most three used programming 
> >>languages  packages used today.
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Talk 
> >>[mailto:[email protected]] 
> >>On Behalf Of Jeremy Curry via Talk
> >>Sent: Thursday, 28 May 2015 21:33
> >>To: [email protected]
> >>Subject: Seeking Your Input
> >>
> >>Hello Everyone,
> >>
> >>We are constantly working behind the scenes to improve our 
> >>products.  If you could narrow down the top three requests you 
> >>would have us add to our screen reading product, what would they be?
> >>
> >>Thanks for the input!
> >>
> >>Jeremy
> >>
> >>Jeremy Curry
> >>Director of Product Management
> >>Ai Squared, Inc.
> >>Phone: (802) 362-3612
> >>Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> >>Web: www.aisquared.com<http://www.aisquared.com/>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
> >>the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> >>
> >>For membership options, visit 
> >>http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/michael.mica
> llef%40gov.mt.
> >>For subscription options, visit 
> >>http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >>List archives can be found at 
> >>http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
> >>the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> >>
> >>For membership options, visit 
> >>http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/david.goldfi
> eld%40outlook.com.
> >>For subscription options, visit 
> >>http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >>List archives can be found at 
> >>http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
> >the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> >
> >For membership options, visit 
> >http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/davidh1999%40
> comcast.net.
> >For subscription options, visit 
> >http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> >List archives can be found at 
> >http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> 
> For membership options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/paulette%40evi
> ckery.com.
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> 
> For membership options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/covici%40ccs.covici.com.
> For subscription options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici
         [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to