Verbosity/browse mode/new page information 1/automatically  read.
Set it to program, and do nothing.


Chris


Window-Eyes Product Support
Ai Squared
725 Airport North Office Park
Fort Wayne, IN 46825
(802) 362-3612
www.aisquared.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Dennis Long via Talk
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 10:26 AM
To: 'gosselin_louis' <[email protected]>; 'Window-Eyes Discussion 
List' <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Outlook 2013, Win-Eyes 9.0 and reading postings

I would like to see not start automatically reading I much rather use down 
arrow to read the message is this possible?

-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of gosselin_louis via Talk
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:55 AM
To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: Outlook 2013, Win-Eyes 9.0 and reading postings

I've installed Win-eyes 9.0, and have been fumbling around with it for a day or 
so, now.  I've also altered the Read-to-end hotkey to ctrl-pause.
I've been noticing that as I open each email message, I regularly hear the 
"clang" sound on plain-text messages, but no sound when the posting is .html.  
I find that strange.  Isn't .html generally considered to be the much less safe 
option than plain-text, so why would you choose to "warn" me about plain-texxt 
messages.  And you have to admit, that clang sound is a real attention-getter!

Secondly, I find that sometimes when I open a message and initiate a 
read-to-end, nothing happens, no matter how often the command is re-issued, no 
matter where you are in the posting, at the top or further down, it doesn't 
matter. Nor does it seem to matter whether the message is .html or .txt.

Then, nearly as often, the command works on the next message, slick as grease.  
This inconsistency of the behavior of Read-to-end is particularly annoying.  
Anyone else experiencing this?  I do have 9.1 on order, so shortly I'll know if 
this situation goes beyond Version 9.0.  Meantime, are there any suggestions or 
observations?

Thank you
Louis Gosselin


_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dennisl1982%40
gmail.com.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/cgrabowski%40aisquared.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com


_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to