I don't know how accessible it is with screen readers, but I found a blog post from one of the web developers at Ancestry.com who talks about their accessibility efforts. Here is an excerpt: "Do our current pages meet all of these [accessibility] requirements ? Nope. That's why we've documented them so that we can provide structure to this effort and have measurable levels of success."
At least they are aware of the problem and trying to do something about it. That's more than we can say about a lot of other organizations out there. Here is a link to the full blog post: http://blogs.ancestry.com/techroots/core-web-accessibility-guidelines/. Best, Marc -----Original Message----- From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don H via Talk Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 5:30 PM To: Window-Eyes Discussion List <[email protected]> Subject: web site accessibility Anyone have any experience with how accessible ancestry.com is using the latest version of WE. _______________________________________________ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/msolomon%40aisquared.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com _______________________________________________ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
