Happy to recuse myself, but I also think it would be useful for the existing psc to vote on the remaining X number of members, whether they are made up of current nominees or otherwise... this will help ensure all psc members have the support of at least a few people
-Josh On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Schuyler Erle <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:39 -0500, Schuyler Erle wrote: > > Now, maybe 10 PSC members is starting to get a little unwieldy, but > > perhaps it would be simplest to start there. Consensus decision making > > works best with smaller numbers, but you can go up to about a dozen and > > still have it still work, if everyone's committed to the process. > > Jeff Johnson has pointed out to me that there were 11 nominees. > Apparently I can't count. :) I still like the idea of allowing nominees > to recuse themselves in order to keep the PSC down to a reasonable > number, and then appointing the rest. I'll volunteer, for one. If anyone > else cares to, then we're down to the original proposed count of nine. > > SDE > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
