+1 ... too many chiefs and no indians
On Dec 8, 2009, at 18:02, Brian Russo <[email protected]> wrote:
I think if people are too preoccupied with being on an official
committee or having this title and that nothing will ever get done.
If people have good ideas we should use them. The purpose of people
in charge is to generate progress; not to generate all the ideas..
Little of the discussion on this list over the past few days seems
to have been very productive IMO.
candidly,
- bri
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Schuyler Erle <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:25 -0800, Christopher Lippitt wrote:
> It seems to me that the PSC can always ask community members to
> make recommendations based on specific needs, even in the form of a
> committee if needed, but that expanding the OAM 'administration'
seems
> a bit premature at this point.
Based on the response, I can see that I was probably off base. You're
all right, of course.
Let me withdraw my initial suggestion and make an alterate proposal:
Why
don't we stick with the voting results, and wait to add new members to
the PSC until we find the need for more and different kinds of
people on
board? Would anyone object to this?
SDE
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
