On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Ian Dees <ian.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Don, > > I'm happy to see some movement on the hardware for OpenAerialMap, but I'm > > questioning the requirements listed here so far. Perhaps I'm late to the > > discussion, but what makes ZFS an essential piece to meet performance > needs? > > What are the anticipated performance needs and who came up with them? It > > seems a little early to hinge lots of technical decisions on a file > > system that we might not even need yet. > > This may be the source. > http://openaerialmap.org/OAM_Hardware_Conference_Call > Sorry if my earlier e-mail came off as negative and grumpy. I did not mean to second-guess anyone in particular, only to find out more information. I'm very happy to see OAM moving and even happier to see help from outside organizations like NPS.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list t...@host134.hostmonster.com http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
