Hi Jeff, Nice Google Docs chart :) I have started a list of Datasets that are available, with the various sources... including WMS layers I mixed them all together. (it's open access)
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Am70fsptsPF2dERHb1RkcXIwMUU1TDR3NF9NbWQxS3c&hl=en My aim is to make a complete chart listing all of the multiple different dataset types into an international list. I could add in all of the WMS layers that i have found, as this could help? Your just looking for imagery right? Cheers, Sam --- Across Canada Trails - Beyond 2017 - The National Trails Network Victoria, BC Canada Twitter: @Acrosscanada Blog: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans Skype: 'Sam Vekemans' IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #CommonMap The Common Map channel (an open chat room) On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, <talk-requ...@openaerialmap.org> wrote: > Send talk mailing list submissions to > t...@openaerialmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > talk-requ...@openaerialmap.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > talk-ow...@openaerialmap.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of talk digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. listing of available imagery with licenses (Jeffrey Warren) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 13:17:40 -0400 > From: Jeffrey Warren <j...@unterbahn.com> > To: talk@openaerialmap.org > Subject: [OAM-talk] listing of available imagery with licenses > Message-ID: > <aanlktikwv_j44rwmsp812kukfw=_q8qqycaa0dhox...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > after the crisismapping discussion yesterday, what think ye of at the very > least compiling existing sources (as in the OAM wiki) but with a bit more > structure as well as with resolution, license, date of capture, formats > available, etc? Something like the following: > > http://grassrootsmapping.org/imagery/ > > We could even measure performance (latency) and so forth to determine > whether putting up a proxy in front of the official source would be a good > idea. > > Also, here's the link to the 1999 survey of existing sources graphed by > temporal vs spatial resolution which I mentioned at the meeting: > http://www.asprs.org/publications/pers/99journal/may/1999_may_611-622.pdf > > That also has a table indicating minimum temporal, spatial, and spectral > resolutions suitable for identifying a variety of data, from road widths to > quality of life indicators, to post-emergency damage. > > Jeff > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://host134.hostmonster.com/pipermail/talk_openaerialmap.org/attachments/20101003/7aad14c8/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > t...@host134.hostmonster.com > http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org > > > End of talk Digest, Vol 28, Issue 1 > *********************************** > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list t...@host134.hostmonster.com http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
