On 19/12/2007 12:47, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Michael Collinson wrote: >> At 07:04 PM 12/18/2007, Mario Salvini wrote: >>> On 18/12/2007, *Mario Salvini* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >>>> How about a TAG "area_entrance=yes" to mark the possibilities to >>>> enter e.g. a parking-area? > >>> good idea, but lets make it that way: >>> >>> tag the node: "area_access" + "direction= in/out/both" (where "both" is >>> defaut if "direction" is not set) > >> Or just connect the parking area (or node if really tiny or >> unsurveyed size) to the road with a highway=service and use >> oneway=yes if appropriate. Simple, requires no extra tags and renders >> out with current renderers. > > Abosolutely. This IMHO is the correct way to connect a parking (or any > other kind of area) to the road network, and I'm sure people are already > using it. It's also perfect topology for routing algorithms etc.
I do that, and indeed often put the interior roads in the car park when it is a large one. David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
