Alex Mauer skrev: > Mario Salvini wrote: >> we also should make a landuse=airport >> > > Why not make aeroway=aerodrome render when applied to areas? > > -Alex Mauer "hawke" >
Why not just use k=landuse v=industrial ? Works for me for both ports and airports, since both are industries - one involving transport by air, and one involving transport by sea. Example : http://informationfreeway.org/?lat=55.610979918413925&lon=12.644511745048664&zoom=13&layers=B000F000 Otherwise I foresee we will end up with a multitude of values for the landuse tag, that the rendererengines need stylesheets for. Including landuse=ToiletAndBathAreaAtRoskildeFestival_Bring_NoseClamp_On_Day_Two_and_Later. I'm suggesting a shitty-brownish-yellow color for that one, right away. Is it really necessary to go that finegrained down, in the definition of the landuse tag ? My point is that sometimes "Less Is More". (Don't say that to your significant other, when she's putting on Make-up. It ranks up there with "Yes, you do look fat in those trousers" on the Major Mistake Comments List. Been there, Done that, Still have the smashed porcelain... ) Do we want a psychedelic multicolored map, or do we want something that people can stand to look at for prolonged durations ? If the former is the general consensus, we should already now think about putting a disclaimer directed at the possible viewers suffering from visually induced epileptic seizures, at the bottom of the mappage... Just my 0.02€'s worth. Dutch _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
