On Dec 24, 2007 2:35 AM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Is there aconsensus to add these to possibilities to the > > access-"transport mode restriction"-list? > > Does that make sense? Both these access restrictions generally come as > "... only" (ways *only* allowed for emergency or farming vehicles), > and I cannot imagine a situation where I would tag "emergency=no"... > > Bye > Frederik
The emergency one makes sense to me. There are cases where, for example, you could use a paved footpath for emergency vehicle access. Normally, a footpath would imply motorcar=no (as far as I know), but emergency=yes would mean it could be used in case of emergency. My assumption of access=private implies emergency=yes despite the restriction, but if that's not possible for whatever reason, you could tag it with emergency=no. Garmin GPS devices support emergency vehicle mode routing, so I think this could be useful. Karl _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
