Quoting Dair Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jochen Topf wrote: > >> One argument for keeping CC or go with another license that requires >> attribution is that some of the (major?) contributions we have seem >> to require that. > > And to turn that argument around, once the TIGER import is > complete what %ge of OSM data will actually be derived from a PD source?
Since it is PD, TIGER would be available regardless of OSM's licence. The companies that have donated (in part) because of CC would not have made their data available regardless. So this doesn't compare. If OSM can happily ignore what some people might regard as its moral obligation to be PD because of TIGER then this just underlines the weakness of PD. - Rob. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk
