Hi, > Rob and Frederik - I don't think it's too much of a leap to say that > you're never going to convince each other. ;)
Yes but I always hope Rob's going to get tired at some point ;) seems I underestimated his stamina though. > If this rough view, however, does not settle so neatly, then the > Foundation will need to decide whether it should embark on a formal > consultation before the relicensing (maybe like the "poll" that some > have mentioned); and the outcome of that consultation would affect the > proposed relicensing. I thought you might use the poll as a "straw poll" just to give you a raw idea, instead of as a kind of "vote" late in the process. > I should note that there's nothing[1] in this process that only the > Foundation can do. That may be true but being the outspoken PD advocate that I am, any poll I created would either be biased or at least be *perceived* to be biased, and thus worthless. It's not only that the Foundation alone has access to all the E-mail addresses (btw: does it? and why?), it is also that the Foundation would probably be trusted to create an unbiased poll. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00.09' E008°23.33' _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk
