On 11 Jan 2008, at 09:22, Nick Black wrote: > We should catalogue the errors and send them back into the OS so they > can do better next time.
We can time how long it would take them to fix it. > > On Jan 11, 2008 8:47 AM, 80n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jan 11, 2008 8:18 AM, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> martin dodge wrote: >>> >>>> Just found an interesting set of slides of a talk by Vanessa >>>> Lawrence, OS >>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/06/eGov-dc/presentations/ >>>> VL_why_place_matters.pdf >>>> with some prominent mentions for OSM. I particularly liked slide 46 >>> >>> That's rather nice! >>> >>> Mrs F points out, however, that the photo in slide 32 ("22 Pine >>> Street, Swindon") is almost certainly not in Swindon, and indeed >>> there is no Pine Street in Swindon. So I'd be very wary of taking >>> the >>> slide's suggestion to route ambulances using OS data. Much more >>> reliable to use OSM. ;) >>> >> >> And on slide 42, Wellington is a place in Somerset, not >> Northumberland. >> >> 80n >> >>> >>> cheers >>> Richard >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk >> >> > > > > -- > Nick Black > -------------------------------- > http://www.blacksworld.net > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk