Dair Grant wrote: > Good point! Which makes it all the more important to have a > mechanism for marking it as such, if only to reduce the number > of people who make pointless trips to the middle of nowhere to > confirm there's nothing there...
There are very few places with "nothing" in them. There might be creeks or peaks or vegetation types. But what we can do is to define layers such as "all secondary or bigger roads" or "all churches, cemetaries and memorial monuments" and indicate whether these feature groups have been covered in an area. -- Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
