as you can see here: http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?x=2152&y=1471&z=12&layer=tile
I was able to add a large river, still cant get exactly thru on creating islands on rivers. but still a good enhancement from last week for me... thanks everybody, S. On 1/28/08, Chris Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm, you're right, Mapnik render of riverbank is not as good as I thought. > It would be good to get this sorted out. waterway tags feels better than > natural=water, but that said breaking up the river into arbitrary chucks > doesn't feel right either. > cheers, > Chris > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: David Groom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Monday, 28 January, 2008 1:16:50 PM > > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Chris Hill" > > > To: "David Groom" ; > > > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:59 AM > > > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers > > > > > > > > > I've use the waterway=riverbank (as described) on the Humber > > estuary, > > > the > > > Ouse and the Trent; it works well, including using > > multipolygon > > > relations > > > for islands. > > > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.7296&lon=-0.6315&zoom=12&layers=0BFT > > > Rendering in Mapnik is good, but the low-zoom Osmarender does > > not > > > work. > > > I'm not sure if this is a problem with the Osmarender definitions > > or > > > that > > > the low-zoom for the tile just doesn't get run. > > > cheers, > > > > Chris , are you sure the mapnik rendering is good? For instance a bit > > further inland on the Humber > > > > see > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.49024&lon=-0.77102&zoom=15&layers=B0FT > > the rendering is not what you might expect. I think what you are > > seeing > > > in > > mapnik is the solid blue fill taken from the original import of the UK > > coastline data. Whereas the area outlined in blue, but not filled > > is > > > the > > rendering of waterway = riverbank. > > > > David > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > >> From: David Groom > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Sent: Monday, 28 January, 2008 12:19:06 AM > > >> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers > > >> > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: "Simone Cortesi" > > >> To: > > >> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 4:20 PM > > >> Subject: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers > > >> > > >> > > >> > Hi, > > >> > > > >> > is there anything going on withthe "Large Rivers" > > proposed > > > feature? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Large_rivers > > >> > > > >> > For the time being, how do I tag large water bodies? Like the > > >> Po > > >> > > > river > > >> > in North Italy or Rhine in Deutschland? > > >> > > > >> > > >> Create as shown on that page, but tag natural=water to ensure > > >> it > > >> > > > renders in > > >> mapnik > > >> > > >> David > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > S. > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Simone Cortesi > > >> > > > >> > All that is gold does not glitter; > > >> > not all those that wander are lost. > > >> > J.R.R. Tolkien > > >> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it > now. > http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- Simone Cortesi All that is gold does not glitter; not all those that wander are lost. J.R.R. Tolkien _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
