Dave Stubbs wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 8:37 AM, Foppe Benedictus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello Andy, >> >> I just asked in IRC if somebody knew if the cyclemap was not updated the >> last 2 weeks, they came up with the why don't you email him solution, so >> here it is.. >> No offence, but I just want to know if I am tagging something wrong or >> there went something wrong or you not having time to do it? >> >> > > Yeah, sorry about this, we upgraded mapnik to get new improved > rendering, and had a small issue where it dropped single digit > references... which has now been fixed. The new rendering looks nicer > than before, it's all sparkly and stuff. Unfortunately Andy is > currently away snowboarding, and I don't have the webhost password to > upload the new tiles. I'll make sure he does the sync the second he > gets back (I think on Sunday). > If you let me know what is was you added I can take a look on the new tiles. > > On a better note, next Wednesday we get a test of the new and improved > rendering process which should mean new tiles start appearing before > the end of the day rather than the 3 days it's been taking recently. > This is a combination of 4x more CPU power, 8x more RAM, and block > tile rendering... all of which makes the actual tile rendering about > 15x faster. But we still have to wait while the planet downloads, and > the planet gets imported into the DB, which takes about 6 times longer > than actually rendering. > It's good to know what's going on and great to hear the news that it's all going to get a lot better and faster.
Many thanks! Jo _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
