On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > It would be naive to think that the OSM database is totally error > > free. > > Of course, but until now I thought it was our common goal to make it > as error free as we can, and in fact when I talked about OSM I > presented it as somewhat "morally superior" to those evil data > providers who lie to us. If I now have an OSM board member publicly > announcing that he knows of easter eggs (and if you would disapprove > of the practice then you would have removed them already!), I cannot > claim that moral high ground for OSM any longer. > > > You are, of course, totally at liberty to find and remove them. > > It seems that you would be in a better position than me to do it. But > maybe, if that's the new project guideline, I'll start with some > creativity as well. I think map data can be a great playing ground > for various senses of humour. > It was a statement of fact, not a guideline or an endorsement. I just said I knew of some, I didn't say that I was responsible for them. > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00.09' E008°23.33' > > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk
