-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Hughes wrote: | In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | |> Unfortunately removing the related node isn't going to work, because |> Mapnik won't then render parking symbols. And it is a lot of work to do |> that. | | I believe it will - as far as I know mapnik has rendered those | symbols for parking areas for some time. | |> Since we have contradictory behaviour in the two renderers we can't |> resolve this automatically unless osmarender can look and see on the fly |> if there is a P node inside the area it is trying to do one for |> automatically. | | I believe it is fundamentally wrong to add nodes which duplicate | areas, although I know it is quite common.
I agree with this wholeheartedly. 1 item on the ground should be 1 item in the database. What no one else has suggested is that if you really need to put something in the DB twice, then at least use a relationship to link the DB objects together. I expect that someone with PostGIS knowledge can construct a query to quickly identify all the parking nodes inside parking areas and produce a list. I'm sure that many of us could write a perl or python script to take this list and delete or relate the nodes. Robert (Jamie) Munro -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHwfo4z+aYVHdncI0RAiLwAKDknPqP+m3PP6okGzOsJl8r4g5LnwCg+iZv CZ/eiOlZbSRqpDOW0QDId4A= =hEE3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
