On 26/02/2008 15:43, David Earl wrote: > On 26/02/2008 14:45, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote: >> Lester Caine wrote: >> | ANY POI that is changed from node to area will potentially have the same >> | problem, and we should be fixing the general rule not starting to build >> | another set of pages for voting on every POI node/area conflict debate? > > I strongly disagree with doing this generally, and will get very upset > if you start deleting my carefully surveyed school nodes for example. > The positions where I've put of these is significant within quite > extensive school grounds.
I should say, I'd have no strong objection in this case to changing these amenity=school nodes to building=school NODES, but that's a very different prospect from deleting them. Ideally I'd have building=school areas, but it is rarely possible to get the shapes on the ground, and Yahoo satellite imagery is a luxury reserved for particular urban areas (someone has carefully done this for the Cambridge colleges, which looks great). David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
