Lars I think this is all sorted out now. Let me know if you suspect any other discrepancies.
80n On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Lars Aronsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 80n wrote: > > > Lars > > Can you point to a couple of specific instances please so that I can > > investigate further? > > If you try this very narrow region, > > wget ' > http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/way[bbox=14.4,58.05,14.6,58.1][note=FIXME<http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/way%5Bbbox=14.4,58.05,14.6,58.1%5D%5Bnote=FIXME>previously > unwayed segment]' -O > mymap.osm > > You will get a 3280 bytes in mymap.osm, containing a few small > untagged ways: > > <way id='8173415' timestamp='2005-06-23T02:14:27Z'> > <way id='8173417' timestamp='2005-06-23T02:14:30Z'> > <way id='8173419' timestamp='2005-06-23T02:15:30Z'> > <way id='8212509' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:11:40Z'> > <way id='8212516' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:12:58Z'> > <way id='8212518' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:14:36Z'> > <way id='8212522' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:14:41Z'> > <way id='8212526' timestamp='2006-02-24T18:15:07Z'> > > Swedes will know this area as the ruins of Brahehus, near lake > Vättern and motorway E4. I mapped this place with line segments > in my first year of OSM, as shown by the timestamps above. Then > Osmarender was introduced and the need to tag ways, and then > someone added "FIXME" tags to old line segments. So just two weeks > ago I edited these ways, combining them into larger units, adding > the appropriate tags and removing the "note=FIXME" tags. > > When you open mymap.osm with JOSM, you will notice that all ways > are 2 nodes (a single line segment) and they are not connected, > but sprinkled out. If you download fresh data from OSM (without > changing the zoom), you will notice that all FIXME tags are gone, > and the ways are larger connected units. > > The last way in the list above, having id=8212526, still exists, > but now is now a 4 node way (highway=motorway_link). It was > tagged "fixme" in the planet.osm dump of 080227, but not in 080305 > or 080312. > > At first I thought that 2-node ways that I had removed were > lingering in osmxapi, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I > guess the neighboring ways 8212523-8212525 were correctly removed. > But the way that remained after my combination and tagging, > 8212526, apparently wasn't modified in osmxapi. > > > > -- > Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
